Knowing when to enter and exit a crypto trade is probably the hardest decision for any user. Automated bots can make both decisions, but many traders still want the final say over how their money is used.

Arcanum Wave puts the trader back in charge. Every four hours, its algorithm identifies setups, scores their strength, and prepares a grid. The user decides whether to enter, how much risk to take, and when to leave.

That control defines both the appeal and the risk.

Arcanum Foundation is a Dubai-based developer of crypto trading tools built mainly around Bybit. Its first product, Pulse, began building a public track record as an automated futures bot in 2024.

The company has since expanded into a wider suite that includes Arcanum Broker, the Wave and Pulse algorithms, trading education, and Web3 development services. 

Key Takeaway

Wave Turns Trading Signals Into Decisions

Arcanum Wave is a signal-assisted trading system for crypto futures. It is not an automated bot.

• The system works on 4-hour candles and can produce up to six trading sessions per day.
• It assigns a strength score from 1 to 100 across supported assets, then provides a configurable grid setup.
• Traders can adjust leverage and use isolated margin while viewing liquidation data and Arcanum’s Buy Risk and Fear indicators.

This design reduces the work involved in finding a trade. Users still control execution, position sizing, and risk.

For an active trader, that division makes sense. Instead of scanning dozens of charts, the user receives a shorter list of structured setups. The four-hour timeframe also avoids the constant activity associated with scalping.

The experience becomes demanding once several grids and leveraged positions are open. An isolated margin limits the potential loss on each position to the margin assigned to that position. It does not use the rest of the account balance as collateral. 

As a result, a losing position can reach liquidation sooner than it would under cross-margin, where available account balance can help absorb losses. Each open grid also reserves its assigned margin, leaving less free balance available for subsequent positions. Bybit’s own margin documentation makes this risk clear.

Arcanum publishes weekly ecosystem figures in its Telegram channel. The Wave entries give closed position counts, 46 between August 10 and 16 and 56 between August 17 and 23, along with a win rate near 99% for July. 

The August 17 to 23 post also claims roughly 1% net profit against account size over seven days. However, it attaches that figure to more than 150 positions closed by users who followed the signals actively, not to the 56 closes the same post credits to Wave. 

Note: The published figure contains no starting equity, realized return, funding costs, open-position drawdown, or loss distribution.

Arcanum’s Trader Make Money profile carries the Wave name and syncs from exchange data. It showed 1,446 closed positions at the time of review. The visible trades were long, with individual gains ranging from 1.43% to 2.41%. 

That range explains how cumulative percentage totals reach the thousands while each trade returns very little. The profile hides dollar profit and displays only closed positions, so the open drawdown stays invisible. One CHZ position ran 92 days before closing for 1.87%.

This is the main challenge when reviewing Wave. Because the trader makes the final decisions, there is no single “Wave return.” Two people can receive the same signal and produce completely different results through leverage, entry timing, grid size, and exit management.

Arcanum told BeInCrypto that the 1-to-100 strength score draws on 14 parameters, including market behavior and candle volume, with additional inputs kept proprietary. Arcanum does not publicly explain how signals at different levels have performed historically. Without that record, a high score can look more certain than it really is.

Arcanum Broker Keeps Trading Inside Bybit

Wave sits inside the new Arcanum Broker ecosystem, which uses Bybit’s exchange infrastructure.

The public onboarding flow is simple. Users sign in through Bybit OAuth rather than opening a separate exchange account. Funds remain at Bybit, while Arcanum supplies the signals, terminal, and broker layer. 

This means Arcanum does not directly custody the trading balance, although users still carry Bybit’s centralized-exchange counterparty risk.

The clearest broker benefit is the fee structure. Arcanum told BeInCrypto that users trade at Bybit VIP 3–VIP 4 rates. On perpetuals, VIP 3 charges 0.0350% for takers and 0.0140% for makers, against 0.0550% and 0.0200% on Bybit’s standard non-VIP schedule. 

Arcanum users would therefore pay less on both sides of the book than a retail account trading directly. Bybit publishes the full rates in its official fee table, and notes that actual rates can vary by region.

Reaching VIP 3 directly requires $500,000 in assets or $50 million in derivatives volume over 30 days. That access is the real saving here, rather than the rate itself.

A taker round trip costs 0.07% of position size before funding and slippage. Opening and closing a $100,000 position once would cost $70. If both fills post as maker orders, that falls to $28, which is the best case rather than the usual one. Costs mount when a grid produces many executions.

Availability is another consideration. Arcanum told BeInCrypto that the restrictions on perpetual trading in the United States and the European Union come from Bybit rather than from Wave.

Prospective users should confirm current eligibility before connecting an account.

How Wave Compares With Pulse

Arcanum began with Pulse, a fully automated system that trades Bybit perpetual futures using daily signals. Pulse spreads positions across a large group of assets and manages entries without requiring the user to approve each trade.

That creates a clear distinction between the two products.

Pulse has a much longer operating history. Its public Trader Make Money profile links to exchange data and states that the trade history cannot be edited. At the time of review, the visible statistics showed a 7.66 profit factor, a two-day average trade duration, and a fully long-biased record.

Those figures still require context. The profile hides dollar profit and displays only closed positions. One visible IOTX position remained open for 192 days before closing.

Arcanum has claimed a 97% win rate across more than 11250 closed positions and over 20500% in cumulative trade returns. These figures should not be read as a 20,500% return on one account. 

Summing the percentage result of thousands of trades does not show how the total portfolio performed.

Pulse nevertheless has an advantage that Wave currently lacks: a single strategy can be tracked over time. Wave’s outcomes remain fragmented across individual traders.

Verdict: Wave Is for Traders Who Want the Work

Wave gives active traders a practical middle ground between searching for every trade manually and handing the entire account to a bot. Its four-hour signals, prepared grids, and Bybit integration can reduce research and execution friction.

It is best suited to traders willing to monitor the market several times a day, keep their own performance journal, and control leverage consistently. That extra involvement can create more opportunities and potentially higher profits than Pulse. It can also produce larger losses when discipline breaks down.

Pulse remains the more logical option for users who want automation and are comfortable with its long-only strategy, performance fee, and potential for positions to remain underwater for extended periods.

Arcanum still needs to publish clearer Wave signal methodology, anonymized net user results, and drawdown data that includes open positions.

Wave is a credible active-trading extension to the Arcanum ecosystem. Its value lies in organizing decisions rather than making them. The trader remains responsible for whether those decisions produce an edge.

Source: BeInCrypto